① 该不该把老人送去养老院 辩论赛 陈词
不该送去养老院:父母来生了我自们，养育之恩大于天，陪伴我们走过了那些需要亲人陪伴的日子。他们老了，可是心里如明镜，知道我们的难处是时老人才会提出去养老院，他们不需要吃的好，住得好，只是想要我们多陪陪他们。善待老人就是善待自己，让后人能够记住中华民族的传统美德。寄人篱下的日子里哪怕只有一天的时间父母也是惦记着我们过得好不好
② “该不该送老人进老人院”辩论赛！反方一辩，不该。 我是一辩，怎样说呢 要长一点，不要抄别人
尊老爱幼抄，是什么意思？就袭是尊敬老人，爱护幼小。老人缺少的是快乐，，希望儿女陪在身边，如果把老人送到老人院，这是违背良心的事。虽然创建老人院也有好处，但那毕竟是给没有亲人的老人住，所以，我们不该把老人送进老人院。完毕！
③ 英语辩论赛“老人是否应该住在老人院里”反方，正方各要一份
l正方：
In my point of view, old man should live in the beadhouse.
And that is a good choice for everyone.
First of all, it is good for the old man. In the beadhouse, there must be nurses and doctors who are good at how to deal with the old man's disease and accidence, so the old man can get health care at anytime. Also the beadhouse can provide special food for the old to feet their need. And all the diets are designed by Dietitians, so it is much better to the old man's health than the common food cook at home. Then there must be other person who may at the same age, so they can just chat with each other and never feel lonely.
On the other hand, it is also good for the kids. Their children is just about their best time of life to fight for a better salary or a better social status. They don't have that much time to care about their parents. So it may leads to two results. One is they spend most time on their parents, their parents get a good care. But they failed in their career. And another is they spend most one the work, and their parents won't take a good care.
But the result for parents is all the same---they feel sad either their children failed in their career or they don't be treated well.
As a conclusion, if the old men live in beadhouse, children can fight for their future and the old men can get a good care. It is the best choice for both.
老人我全部用的 man来写的，因为真的不知道有什么其他的专业词，对不起了。思路应该还是挺清晰的。写的很多，可以截一部分来用。
这个话题其实正方需要用事实和数据说话，而反方需要以情感人。如果正方在感情问题，亲情问题纠缠过多的话那就陷入了反方的圈套。毕竟中国人是非常重亲情和传统的国家。正方需要做的就是主要说明养老院比家里更专业，照顾的更到位，有专业的各种人员服务老人，老人在敬老院的幸福指数很高。住进养老院更有利于老人的健康等。同时辅助说明，如果在家里对谁都不好，希望孩子的事业成功，不想拖累孩子。这个问题不可多谈。正方基本就成功了。
正方讲的是理性，反方讲的就是感性。
反方：
From our perspective, old people shouldn't live in the beadhouse for the following reasons.
First of all, although the beadhouse may provide a good service for the old people's physical health, however, mental health is much more important than the physical health. Old people just want to live with their children which can provide them pure love. And they also can feel this love from daily life at home. We cannot deprive their right to love and be loved. Because they are your parents who raise you up, who care about you, who really love you. The birds even know to feed their parents back. What about the human beings? They don't want you to spend too much time on them, but it doesn't mean that they don't need you, need your love, need your care.
Secondly,if they live in the beadhouse, they won't feel happy. Since all the old people love the things doing as usual, it will be a huge change while they live in the beadhouse. They don't want anyting to change, especilly their home, they may cannot sleep for a very long time. And as usual, they may like to talk to their kids, teach their grandsons or granddaughters, chat with old friends, which make them happy. But all the things changed, they may feel miserable. That's the result we don't want to see.
So,for the reasons above, we don't agree that let old people live in the beadhouse.
终于写完了，感觉不是非常煽情，但是要点基本都写到了。这段话需要非常煽情，才能感动人。如果可以感动在场观众的话，那么基本就赢了。
写了这么多，希望能对你有用。
顺便把分给我吧。。。一个下午都在搞这个东西。。。最好能加加分。。。
嘿嘿。。
④ 辩论赛一辩陈词"不应该送老人进敬老院"
观点：不应该送老人进敬老院
这个观点得分得清楚点，老人到底指的是自版己至亲的权老人（长辈）还是泛指所有的老人。
倘若没说清楚，一辩要说的全面，不然会留下很多漏洞。
这个主题打辩论主要存在：道德和现实。显然我方是站在道德上面的，所以坚守道德这一观点是很有利处的一方
一、至亲。
1、从中国的道德上加以抨击对方观点，重点强调中国百善孝为先，至亲对我们的养育之恩，不是用敬老院作为孝敬加以回报，这行为可耻；；
2、老人进入敬老院之后发生的事情（不如失去子女的精神支柱、某些敬老院的不规范……），很多对老人不利的因素（例子网上很多）；
3、亮出自己的观点，同时抨击对方观点（从对老人的精神上、自己本身的花费……）
若是泛指所有的老人，还是以道德这一概念坚守
切记，不要管敬老院是什么组织，敬老院对老人有什么利处（什么健康、娱乐……），千万不要说到这些，不然就进入对方的陷进，为对方答辩了，遇到这些就跳回道德。
有点讲废话，还是自己组织吧。
⑤ 把老人放到敬老院好还是不好辩论赛发言稿反方
为你解答在复辩论会上制反方的观点，你可以这样反驳：因为时代在不断进步，因此人类的脚步会越来越快，忙碌的工作、频繁的应酬、身心的疲惫，让我们没有足够的时间可以去照顾我们的父母，把他们送进养老院，里面都是老人，他们有的是时间，他们还都有共同话题，他们也可以聊聊家常，我们把他们送进去就不是代表我们不管他们，我们同样也会抽空经常去看望他们，作为对孩子们的理解，同时也表达自己老来对伟大祖国的奉献，（做好建设者的后盾）我想父母也会赞同的！
⑥ 辩论赛赞成送老人去敬老院的问题有哪些
也就是你要支持这一说法的话 其实我不支持去养老院 老人在养老院里可以得到回全面的照答顾 包括吃穿 等 砸哪里有同龄的老伙伴作伴 不会闷 要是说孩子会给父母最好的照顾 那么问问他上班有时间吗 难道就为了让父母见他一面就要把他留在家里吗 虽然说在家里是老人最好的选择 但是在孩子没有时间陪老人的情况下 他不能自理 或者行动不便 难道要他使用我们这么现代的家庭电器吗 有那个孩子会放心呢 如果请保姆你会保证保姆会真心的对待老人吗 虐待老人儿童的保姆是不是频频出现呢 我只能说这些 因为 要我我还是做反方 谢谢采纳 希望可以帮你一点小忙
⑦ 辩论赛把老人送到敬老院的利弊， 需要写的更全面的 谢谢
不可能复有人写那么详细的制，也没意义，只能给你提供个思路
利：老人能和别的同龄人交流、休闲，减少了子女照顾的压力
弊：会造成老人内心的孤独，毕竟不是和自己的亲人，而内向的老人更难以和别人交往，一些敬老院还会出现虐待老人的现象，给老人的晚年造成心理阴影