❶ 求「獨生子女利大於弊」辯論會資料···謝謝啦!!!!
然而,事物總是一分為二的,在獨生子女教育方面,也存在一些不利條件。
一:家長錯誤的教養態度。
有些父母不能理智的教育孩子,過分的溺愛、遷就,對孩子沒有一定的行為要求,百依百順,任其所為,助長了孩子的自私、任性、霸道、缺乏自製力等的行為。有些父母不理解幼兒的心理特點,過多的干涉、保護,不理解孩子的好動、好奇的天性,怕有危險,緊緊地束縛孩子,完全不給孩子自主活動的餘地,壓制了孩子的意志力的發展。過分的生活照顧和包辦代替,致使孩子養成了自命不凡,驕傲固執,精神脆弱,經不起失敗挫折的不良性格傾向。
二:缺乏兄弟姐妹的教育因素。
獨生子女缺乏同兄弟姐妹以及其他小朋友一起生活的訓練和鍛煉,不懂得分享和輪流,父母的寵愛可以說全被唯一的孩子所佔有,家中的玩具、點心或衣物都屬於他一個人,容易滋長不合群、自顧自、獨佔一切的思想、感情,同情心與責任感也顯的比較薄弱。
三:家庭教育的不一致。
獨生子女家庭往往比非獨生子女家庭存在更嚴重的問題就是遇到問題態度不一致,當孩子犯了錯誤時,會出現「爸爸打,媽媽護。爺爺奶奶打圓場的」現象。還會因子女教育引起家庭糾紛。一般來說,獨生子女受到祖輩的嬌貫、放縱要比父母更厲害,特別是在三代同堂的家庭中,教育不一致的問題更加容易發生。
由此可見,對獨生子女的教育,既有有利條件,又有不利條件,只要我們正確地把握獨生子女的教育特點和規律,就可以發揮有利條件,克服不利條件,從而取得最佳的教育效果。
❷ 獨生子女好不好辯論會反方意見(要英文的)
希望對你有幫助, 祝你幸運
The first born child or an only child get many benefits from the parents. When they are first born they are lavished with attention and often times spoiled, getting whatever they want, not learning much discipline. The way parents teach the first/only child discipline and respect is much how they will react to situations much later in life. If the child stays an only child, in life the child will depend on their parents much of their life.
There is not a separation within the bond between parents and children when no other siblings are born, and thus parents are free to give all their attention and devote all their time towards the one child.
If the child is the first born and has other siblings, they tend to become very jealous at first. In this jealousy it could also cause them to lash out in irrational ways, but just at first. Generally the first born will then take on a silent responsibility of the second siblings. They protect them and have a knowledge of what a parent expects from them. Also they can tend to have more expected out of them from parents. Once a second child is born, the parents sometimes assume that the second child should take after the first, which in any case does not happen. The first born child usually drifts off and becomes more independent right away. They will tend to fend for themselves, taking on more tasks than they can handle and will not ask for help. Pleasing parents and trying to live up to expectations may be sometimes trying for a first born, but in most cases the expectations are set by themselves. They have the desire to succeed in many things in life, not only for other people, but for self fulfillment.
In most cases first born children will go into business as a career. They would be good in careers such as law, or as a cooperate in a business. Not much into dreaming, they like things straight forward and like to get tasks done at hand before jumping into bigger projects. Getting one thing done at a time is their objective. Usually a first born child will marry a last born child. The last borns need to be taken care of and the first borns need to take care of someone
❸ 獨生子女不利於社會發展辯論賽四辯總結陳詞
四辯來總結陳詞寫稿一般要依據自自己的論點來總結和升華。所謂總結就是根據雙方場上的攻防來梳理你認為最重要的一到兩點以說服評委。所謂升華就是在總結的基礎上提出自己的價值宣導。拿這個辯題為例正方可能會說獨生子女政策很好的控時了人口。作為反方可以說獨生子女由於一個人容易被溺愛成長會孤單性格可能會更有個性一點 扣著辯題落實到社會就是可能會使社會更加獨立與冷漠。 另一點還可以說繼續實行獨生子女政策造成了人口老齡化。 那麼在總結陳詞時正方的論點就和反方的第二點沖突就需要梳理場上情況告訴評委確實會帶來老齡化。 而第一點可以做升華溫情與陪伴在社會的重要性。 另外還可以就生育中墮胎的人道性升華
❹ 獨生子女好不好反方辯論詞(急~急~急~
有利也有弊,要是長久下去保證會讓人類滅絕!另外小孩今後沒有親人來往。但對懶惰者來說,可以省事,對社會來說少浪費份資源。
❺ 辯論賽:獨生子女的好處
沒感覺獨生子女有什麼好處或者說好處不多,特別是在現在這個年代。
❻ 辯論賽 獨生子女政策利大於弊,正方怎麼辯論。
一:從人口,資源,環境,社會基礎設施,社會保障,家庭負擔方面回答
二:
❼ 辯論賽 獨生子女有優勢還是非獨生子女有優勢
對於獨生子女來說,家庭成長的條件可能相比非獨生子女要更優越一些,但是真正專到婚姻市屬場里,這種優越可能會有一定的影響。
相比多子女的家庭來說,獨生子女家庭等老人老了之後,負擔會比多子女家庭更重一些,最起碼從人力上來講,就沒有辦法更多的分擔。但從另一方面來講,多子女家庭內部其實矛盾也會更多,獨生子女家庭就相對簡單,總之有利有弊。
(7)獨生子女好辯論賽擴展閱讀:
注意事項:
獨生子女父母若在生前就准備好遺囑,而且對遺囑進行公證,則可以從根本上解決獨生子女繼承遺產難這一問題。
如果沒有遺囑的情況下,可以到派出所出具證明,繼承人本人沒有兄弟姐妹,被繼承人的父母也死亡的證明。只要公安機關出具的有親屬關系的戶口證明情況,就能證明這個孩子是唯一合法繼承人,然後到法院打個確認之訴,確認房子根據繼承法的相關規定歸繼承人所用就可以。
❽ 獨生子女好不好辯論賽反方三辯稿
有兄弟姐妹的好處!這是在鼓勵多生?!不過,有時候,你鼓勵別人多生專,別人屬還不樂意呢!養小孩的成本太大,工資低,物價高!國家是有錢,但是,老百姓沒錢,養不起,不敢生!獨生子女是最要緊的,結了婚,夫妻二人要贍養四個老人!生活不易!
❾ 辯論獨生子女的好處
好處有:減慢人口增長速度,緩解由於人口過度增長給社會資源和自然資源帶來的壓力,有利於地球上動植物的和諧生存;
減輕家庭經濟負擔,緩解父母生活壓力,避免許多家庭矛盾的產生。
能夠享受更平等且幸福的親情,3口之家其樂融融.有時候家裡多一個人總是會有所變化,獨生就不用考慮偏心不偏心的問題,以後照顧父母也用不著推來推去了,因為都是一個人的責任了.
❿ 英語辯論,有關獨生子女好這一方的觀點 3分鍾陳述
alright. there are some of these things we can get from adopting one-child policy:firstly, From the family's perspect, the family could save a lot more financially and mentally, since the population amount is such a large numble, people will have to work harder and much bitter to obtain what they need to bring up more children in a family. And as the children grow up, their needs of ecation, living and health also draging the family into a position that is pretty bitter for most of the familes, especally the ones in the rural area who are hardly able to pay for the needs of ecation and heath as well as living for the children. Secondly, from the nation's perspect, the more people in the society mean more buden to take care of, which totally is not a good option for getting a country to become strong in the world for the goverment who has to pay more to ensure the indivial 's right to be carried on, and that most likely won't be less and less possble as people are getting more and more. Consideing that the recouses of the society is limited and there won't be that much for a huge numble of people to survive without getting people into fight againt each other.I think thats all.